Level 3 blames Internet slowdowns on Technica
jgreco at ns.sol.net
Fri Mar 21 16:22:05 UTC 2014
> On Mar 21, 2014, at 11:01 AM, Joe Greco <jgreco at ns.sol.net> wrote:
> > Why wouldn't you instead charge for the build out as a NRC and then =
> > for maintenance as a MRC?
> I for one would be willing to bear a high NRC start-up cost for someone =
> building fiber to my home. Not everyone would make that tradeoff.
I was discussing the cost that the service provider had to pay in the
context of a "$4/mo copper pair" for rental of a copper pair that the
ILEC almost certainly did not need to install. I do not see why the
cost for build out needs to be included in the actual monthly cost an
ILEC needs to charge.
I think that utilities have a long history of proving that the cost
for build out can be successfully charged to the property owner in
several ways as you note. I don't see it as being an insurmountable
problem to find some way for an intermediate service provider to
deal with this if needed.
Joe Greco - sol.net Network Services - Milwaukee, WI - http://www.sol.net
"We call it the 'one bite at the apple' rule. Give me one chance [and] then I
won't contact you again." - Direct Marketing Ass'n position on e-mail spam(CNN)
With 24 million small businesses in the US alone, that's way too many apples.
More information about the NANOG