US to relinquish control of Internet
Jimmy Hess
mysidia at gmail.com
Sun Mar 16 05:47:21 UTC 2014
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
>On the other hand, I am very concerned about what they would do to the
>numbers side of things..
Just keep their grubby paws off the IETF and the internet standards
process..... I doubt there's much reason for concern. IPv4 is pretty
much already spoken for, and probably even they could not screw up IPv6
allocation. It's not as if they would be free to invent crazy new
numbering schemes.
I'm not too worried about what they could do to TLDs... It would be hard to
> make a bigger mess than ICANN already has.
>
What comes to mind is scrapping WHOIS due to "privacy concerns", and
replacing it with a filing with a private national authority for the TLD,
accessible primarily to law enforcement (and not incident
responders/operators/infosec/anti-spam people).
How TLDs COULD be screwed up worse than ICANN......
introducing "regional TLDs", for coded regions (similar to DVD region
locking), and region-locking existing TLDs --- Or certain agreements and
fees will be required for an ISP to "subscribe" to a certain TLD,
including agreement to pay kickbacks for "Data transfer" and termination
fees related to DNS queries and site access, according to rate schedules
that the receiving country will be free to set, however exorbitantly they
like ---- to the benefit of certain countries desiring to limit access
or charge access fees for subscription to out-of-region DNS content; and
splitting the root zone, so that domains registered in a certain region
cannot be resolved in other regions,
> Owen
>
>
>
--
-Mysid
More information about the NANOG
mailing list