BGP attributes through IGP

Glen Turner gdt at
Fri Mar 7 00:19:04 UTC 2014

Saku Ytti wrote:
> It's essentially abusing (some what well-defined and interoperable abuse) 32b
> tag field for this purpose.

That's pretty much what the OSPF tag and the BGP's synchronisation with OSPF were originally intended for.

However it's pretty much a design misfeature and you'd be happier with iBGP over a tunnel


More information about the NANOG mailing list