Filter on IXP
Vitkovský Adam
adam.vitkovsky at swan.sk
Sun Mar 2 12:45:13 UTC 2014
> On the other hand, if a member provides transit, he will add its
> customer prefixes to RaDB / RIPEdb with appropriate route
> objects and the ACL will be updated accordingly. Shouldn't break there.
And that's a really nice side effect.
However in case of transit providers the problem is that RaDB /RIPE lists what prefixes you are allowed to advertise.
But that does not necessarily fully match with what source IPs can leave your network.
I mean ISP-A can have a customer that uses PA range of other ISP-B and only has a static route towards ISP-A for some TE purposes.
I'm not well versed with RIPE myself so I'm not sure whether there's a way to handle this situation.
adam
-----Original Message-----
From: Jérôme Nicolle [mailto:jerome at ceriz.fr]
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 6:03 PM
To: Nick Hilliard; nanog at nanog.org
Subject: Re: Filter on IXP
Le 28/02/2014 17:52, Nick Hilliard a écrit :
> this will break horribly as soon as you have an IXP member which
> provides transit to other multihomed networks.
It could break if filters are based on announced prefixes. That's preciselly why uRPF is often useless.
On the other hand, if a member provides transit, he will add its customer prefixes to RaDB / RIPEdb with appropriate route objects and the ACL will be updated accordingly. Shouldn't break there.
--
Jérôme Nicolle
+33 6 19 31 27 14
More information about the NANOG
mailing list