Any experience with Comcast digital voice for OOB (offlist is fine)

Eric Tykwinski eric-list at truenet.com
Sat Mar 1 20:20:29 UTC 2014


Thanks all,

Jared, sorry I forgot about out-of-band touch tones and should of specified better, the client was looking to use a modem like most guessed.
I suggested using a cellular option since POTS wasn't available, as most gear usually has that as an option, and it looks like US Robotics makes a serial connection modem at that.

I do remember though something about a modem over VoIP protocol being developed, something like Jay was saying about Faxing over VoIP, but I guess it never took off.  My guess being relying on the same line as an internet connection would be about that smart anyways.

Sincerely,

Eric Tykwinski
TrueNet, Inc.
P: 610-429-8300
F: 610-429-3222

On Mar 1, 2014, at 1:49 PM, Keegan Holley <no.spam at comcast.net> wrote:

> As others have said modems require POTS or at least a PBX line.  Also isn’t the hand-off fog VoIP ethernet?  You wouldn’t be able to stick that into the RJ-11 port in the modem.  It would be easier to use the comcast internet connection with some sort of IPsec tunnel for OOB.  It’s cheap and mostly reliable.
> 
> If you’re looking for a better solution see the thread on OOB gear RE: opengear.  They are multi-port and support, POTS, wifi and 3G for access.
> 
> On Feb 28, 2014, at 2:27 PM, eric-list at truenet.com wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Sincerely,
>> 
>> Eric Tykwinski
>> TrueNet, Inc.
>> P: 610-429-8300
>> F: 610-429-3222
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 





More information about the NANOG mailing list