Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion
Lee at asgard.org
Thu Jun 19 21:24:02 UTC 2014
On 6/19/14 4:30 PM, "Christopher Morrow" <morrowc.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
>On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Lee Howard <Lee at asgard.org> wrote:
>> How does IPv6 to end users make IPv4 unnecessary for growth, if
>> enterprises and content providers haven't deployed IPv6?
>content folk are mostly getting v6 done already, right? (minus AWS/etc
>which are on-plan to deploy as near as I can tell)
>I don't think enterprise folk matter here, they'll get to v6 when they
>have enough problems related to v4 content reachability... and when
>they try the ISP network ought to be prepared to deal with them.
7.94% Google hits in the U.S. come from IPv6 addresses.
7.29% of web sites have a working AAAA.
>which content providers (large-ish ones) are lagging still?
Microsoft: live.com, Bing, MSN, microsoft.com
Disney, Go, ESPN
Most porn sites (one has a dead AAAA).
The web site of any TV channel, or any bank.
Not to mention the million web pages at hosting providers.
More information about the NANOG