Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion

Lee Howard Lee at asgard.org
Thu Jun 19 20:27:46 UTC 2014


On 6/19/14 2:50 PM, "Christopher Morrow" <morrowc.lists at gmail.com> wrote:

>On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Edward Arthurs
><earthurs at legacyinmate.com> wrote:
>> You are correct, but this is the tip of the iceberg as other
>>configurations will need to come into play as pointed out by several
>>people on this thread.
>> This learning curve is not impossible, if the net admin really applies
>>his/her self to learning it.
>>
>
>I'd still say that for uptake across the board the mid/small business
>(and even large business) isn't relevant. The numbers of these are so
>small as to be insignificant to the problem.
>
>Solving the problem for end-users seems like where ISP folk should
>spend their time, and really it's in their best interest to do that so
>they can keep expanding their customer base as ipv4 resources become
>less available in their networks and globally.

How does IPv6 to end users make IPv4 unnecessary for growth, if
enterprises and content providers haven't deployed IPv6?

Lee





More information about the NANOG mailing list