Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion
bzs at world.std.com
Thu Jun 19 19:59:34 UTC 2014
But I thought ICANN was supposed to be the new and future nexus for
all things internet governance?
On June 19, 2014 at 13:57 morrowc.lists at gmail.com (Christopher Morrow) wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Barry Shein <bzs at world.std.com> wrote:
> > Really. You're really completely discounting ICANN in having any
> > leadership or participative role in the IPv4/IPv6 transition?
> What leadership position have you seen them take ASIDE from marketing
> (in the last 2-3 yrs, but most of that has been ISOC not ICANN
> directly) in the last 5 yrs or so?
The World | bzs at TheWorld.com | http://www.TheWorld.com
Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: 800-THE-WRLD | Dial-Up: US, PR, Canada
Software Tool & Die | Public Access Internet | SINCE 1989 *oo*
More information about the NANOG