Can anyone check this routing against Charter in WI?

Rusty Dekema rdekema at gmail.com
Mon Jun 16 00:10:33 UTC 2014


Are you still seeing odd routing with Charter in Wisconsin? Charter's
routing in Michigan seems to be going pretty crazy at the moment as well.

The following traceroute is from a Charter residential line* in Kalamazoo
MI to a Comcast business (DOCSIS) line in Ypsilanti MI, by way of several
unknown hops, some of which are in RFC 1918 space, Sprintlink possibly in
Fort Worth TX, another unknown hop, then Comcast Dallas TX, Comcast
Marietta GA, Comcast Ashburn VA, then finally Comcast MI. Needless to say,
this is not the normal route:

    http://pastebin.com/9CKmea6M

Tracing the same route but in the other direction also yields odd results.
The route proceeds normally to a Comcast ibone router in 350 E. Cermak
(Chicago IL), but the very next hop after that router is the public IP of
the Charter service in Kalamazoo MI as follows:

    http://pastebin.com/VCCgnUsn

For what it's worth, if anyone could explain to me what might cause that
behavior (between hops 8 and 9), I would really appreciate the knowledge.

The routing between that same Charter residential service and a
Merit/Michnet endpoint in southeast Michigan is also odd, taking a detour
through Virginia [xe-8-3-0.1018.asbn0.tr-cps.internet2.edu (198.71.47.25)],
which it does not normally do. The routing in that case does appear to be
the same regardless of which side you initiate the traceroute from.

Cheers,
Rusty Dekema


* The Charter residential line's IP address is currently reverse resolving
to a Charter DHCP pool in Bay City, MI, which is over 100 miles from
Kalamazoo. This is also unusual. The Charter service in question is now and
has always been located in Kalamazoo MI.




On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Mikeal Clark <mikeal.clark at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hoping someone auditing the list can provide some insight or a back
> channel support option.
>
> I started having some good latency spikes last night, which have
> continued this morning, so I finally took a look at things and I am
> seeing a lot more routing than I expected.  Support is telling me this
> is normal but I don't remember this many replies on traceroute.  My
> speeds are about 1/5 the normal as well this morning and seeing some
> dropped packets even using a test sight inside Charter's network.
> This is just business cable so my support options are pretty limited.
>
> 4    10 ms    14 ms    13 ms
> dtr01shbywi-tge-0-3-0-23.shby.wi.charter.com [96.34.24.178]
>   5    18 ms    11 ms    17 ms  dtr01wbndwi-bue-2.wbnd.wi.charter.com
> [96.34.30.17]
>   6    12 ms    11 ms    11 ms  dtr02wbndwi-bue-1.wbnd.wi.charter.com
> [96.34.24.56]
>   7    17 ms    11 ms    11 ms  dtr02fdulwi-bue-3.fdul.wi.charter.com
> [96.34.30.19]
>   8    13 ms    18 ms    18 ms  dtr01fdulwi-bue-1.fdul.wi.charter.com
> [96.34.19.144]
>   9    19 ms    14 ms    15 ms  crr03fdulwi-bue-2.fdul.wi.charter.com
> [96.34.20.8]
>  10    30 ms    22 ms    35 ms  crr02euclwi-bue-6.eucl.wi.charter.com
> [96.34.22.240]
>  11    23 ms    22 ms    43 ms  bbr02euclwi-bue-4.eucl.wi.charter.com
> [96.34.2.6]
>  12    22 ms    34 ms    19 ms  bbr01euclwi-bue-5.eucl.wi.charter.com
> [96.34.0.6]
>  13    34 ms    30 ms    38 ms
> bbr01stcdmn-tge-0-0-0-3.stcd.mn.charter.com [96.34.0.115]
>  14    42 ms    43 ms    52 ms  65.46.47.77
>  15    78 ms    78 ms    92 ms  ae1d0.mcr2.minneapolis-mn.us.xo.net
> [216.156.1.86]
>  16    93 ms    82 ms    82 ms  vb1711.rar3.denver-co.us.xo.net
> [216.156.0.173]
>  17    81 ms    95 ms    82 ms  te-3-0-0.rar3.sanjose-ca.us.xo.net
> [207.88.12.58]
>  18    83 ms    82 ms    98 ms  207.88.14.226.ptr.us.xo.net [207.88.14.226
> ]
>  19    81 ms    78 ms    78 ms  216.156.84.6.ptr.us.xo.net [216.156.84.6]
>  20    77 ms    78 ms    88 ms
> xe-2-2-0-955.jnrt-edge02.prod1.netflix.com [69.53.225.30]
>  21    86 ms    78 ms    78 ms  te1-8.csrt-agg02.prod1.netflix.com
> [69.53.225.10]
>  22    79 ms    78 ms    82 ms  www.trynetflix.com [69.53.236.17]
>
>   4    12 ms    11 ms     8 ms
> dtr01shbywi-tge-0-3-0-23.shby.wi.charter.com [96.34.24.178]
>   5    17 ms    10 ms    12 ms  dtr01wbndwi-bue-2.wbnd.wi.charter.com
> [96.34.30.17]
>   6    11 ms     9 ms    15 ms  dtr02wbndwi-bue-1.wbnd.wi.charter.com
> [96.34.24.56]
>   7    15 ms    18 ms    18 ms  dtr02fdulwi-bue-3.fdul.wi.charter.com
> [96.34.30.19]
>   8    16 ms    14 ms    11 ms  dtr01fdulwi-bue-1.fdul.wi.charter.com
> [96.34.19.144]
>   9    20 ms    14 ms    15 ms  crr03fdulwi-bue-2.fdul.wi.charter.com
> [96.34.20.8]
>  10    22 ms    22 ms    18 ms  crr02euclwi-bue-6.eucl.wi.charter.com
> [96.34.22.240]
>  11    18 ms    22 ms    22 ms  bbr02euclwi-bue-4.eucl.wi.charter.com
> [96.34.2.6]
>  12    35 ms    30 ms    31 ms  bbr01chcgil-bue-1.chcg.il.charter.com
> [96.34.0.9]
>  13    27 ms    27 ms    27 ms  prr01chcgil-bue-2.chcg.il.charter.com
> [96.34.3.9]
>  14    27 ms    27 ms    27 ms
> 96-34-152-30.static.unas.mo.charter.com [96.34.152.30]
>  15    29 ms    32 ms    27 ms  209.85.244.1
>  16    27 ms    27 ms    28 ms  209.85.254.238
>  17    54 ms    40 ms    40 ms  209.85.248.214
>  18    38 ms    40 ms    38 ms  216.239.43.217
>  19     *        *        *     Request timed out.
>  20    44 ms    40 ms    40 ms  google-public-dns-a.google.com [8.8.8.8]
>



More information about the NANOG mailing list