routing issues to AWS via 2914(NTT)

joel jaeggli joelja at bogus.com
Sat Jun 14 02:29:37 UTC 2014


On 6/13/14, 2:28 PM, Matt Palmer wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 11:44:51AM +0000, Paul WALL wrote:
>> Amazon peers at many key exchanges, with dozens of hosting shops
>> (where customers might share mutual infrastructure) like yours:
>>
>> https://www.peeringdb.com/view.php?asn=16509
>>
>> Rather than play the blame game with third-party transit providers,
>> why not hit them up for some sessions?
> 
> That'll only get you peering connectivity into the local region.  To get
> fully-peered with AWS, and be able to avoid third-party transit providers
> entirely, you're going to have to be in a *lot* of places.
> 
> Not saying that AWS is a bad peer (from experience, I know they're fine to
> deal with) but it isn't as cut-and-dried as saying "don't blame transit
> providers, just peer!".

just peer in IAD, SEA and SJC, and AMS, and SIN. problem solved, yup.

> - Matt
> 


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 286 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20140613/e3916801/attachment.sig>


More information about the NANOG mailing list