Carrier Grade NAT
owen at delong.com
Wed Jul 30 23:39:14 UTC 2014
On Jul 30, 2014, at 11:41 AM, Fred Baker (fred) <fred at cisco.com> wrote:
> On Jul 30, 2014, at 8:45 AM, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
>> I will say that if amazon would get off the dime and support IPv6, it would make a significant difference.
> Someone that works for Amazon once told me that they are primed for it now; the question is whether their customers tick the box appropriately.
Owens-MacBook-Pro:toneAC owendelong$ host www.amazon.com
www.amazon.com has address 220.127.116.11
Owens-MacBook-Pro:toneAC owendelong$ host www.google.com
www.google.com has address 18.104.22.168
www.google.com has address 22.214.171.124
www.google.com has address 126.96.36.199
www.google.com has address 188.8.131.52
www.google.com has address 184.108.40.206
www.google.com has IPv6 address 2607:f8b0:4005:802::1010
It appears to me that they have failed to tick their own box correctly.
I was talking about Amazon, not AWS. Yes, AWS would help too, but in terms of the Alexa list, Amazon would swing the percentage meaningfully. I don’t know to what extent AWS would swing the percentage.
More information about the NANOG