Carrier Grade NAT
cb.list6 at gmail.com
Wed Jul 30 17:53:59 UTC 2014
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:56 PM, Mark Andrews <marka at isc.org> wrote:
> In message <CAMfXtQwmpEqBk9CKRq2MpW15tRcuicZ_3DoJUsTBAM4=50319A at mail.gmail.com>, Gary Buhrmaster writes:
>> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 5:22 AM, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
>> > On Jul 29, 2014, at 4:13 PM, Mark Andrews <marka at isc.org> wrote:
>> >> Add to that over half your traffic will switch to IPv6 as long as
>> >> the customer has a IPv6 capable CPE. That's a lot less logging you
>> >> need to do from day 1.
>> > That would be nice, but I’m not 100% convinced that it is true.
>> For the 99.99% of the users who believe that facebook and twitter
>> *are* the internet, at least facebook is IPv6 enabled. 50.00%(*)!
>> Yes, I think we can all stipulate that those participating
>> on this list are different, and have different expectations,
>> and different capabilities, than those other 99.99%.
>> (*) If we are going to make up statistics, four significant
>> digits looks better than one.
> Enable IPv6 at home and measure the traffic. I did, which is why
> I say > 50%.
Orange Poland deployed 464XLAT on mobile and is seeing 62% native IPv6
and 38% NAT64 (slide 26)
I don't have good measurements on this, but i assume the 11 million
464XLAT subscribers on T-Mobile US show a similar profile, possibly
higher due to Netflix now supporting IPv6 on Android.
> Mark Andrews, ISC
> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka at isc.org
More information about the NANOG