Muni Fiber and Politics
brunner at nic-naa.net
Wed Jul 23 16:33:08 UTC 2014
On 7/23/14 5:30 AM, Scott Helms wrote:
> The people involved in the bond arrangements
> almost invariably see having the city the layer 3 provider as more reliable
> path to getting repaid than an open system.
I assumed this was true, that bonds with the revenue stream based upon
rights-of-way lease only, or row+dark-fiber, or ... were each
incrementally easier to sell, having incrementally larger per-customer
If anyone has specific bonds, or bonding experiences they can point to
I'd appreciate the pointers.
More information about the NANOG