Fwd: Hurricane Electric packet loss
Shawn L
shawnl at up.net
Tue Jul 22 18:37:13 UTC 2014
On our HE uplink, I'm seeing no packet loss until your hop #9
at that point I see alot
HOST: ******** Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
1.|-- ******* 0.0% 10 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.0
2.|-- ******* 0.0% 10 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.0
3.|-- ******* 0.0% 10 4.4 4.5 4.3 4.6 0.0
4.|-- gigabitethernet3-5.core1. 0.0% 10 15.6 15.1 14.1 17.2 1.0
5.|-- 10ge5-7.core1.mci3.he.net 0.0% 10 26.2 26.7 26.2 30.1 1.0
6.|-- 10ge5-1.core1.den1.he.net 0.0% 10 39.7 39.7 39.5 40.2 0.0
7.|-- 10ge14-5.core1.lax2.he.ne 0.0% 10 66.8 65.9 63.5 68.4 1.6
8.|-- 2001:504:13::3b 0.0% 10 73.0 73.0 72.8 73.1 0.0
9.|-- 2402:7800:100:1::55 80.0% 10 71.8 71.8 71.8 71.9 0.0
10.|-- ten-0-5-0-0.cor01.syd04.n 0.0% 10 228.0 228.1 227.9 228.3 0.0
11.|-- ge-0-1-4.cor02.syd03.nsw. 0.0% 10 228.4 228.4 228.3 228.6 0.0
12.|-- 2402:7800:0:2::18a 10.0% 10 228.2 228.1 228.0 228.3 0.0
13.|-- 2001:dcd:12::10 10.0% 10 229.2 229.3 229.2 229.5 0.0
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Wolfgang Nagele (AusRegistry)
<wolfgang.nagele at ausregistry.com.au> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We’ve been customers of Hurricane Electric for a number of years now and
always been happy with their service.
>
> In recent months packet loss on some of their major routes has become a
very common (every few days) occurrence. Without knowledge of their network
I am unsure what’s the cause of it but we’ve seen it on the Tokyo - US
routes as well as the London - US routes. It reminds me of the Cogent
expansion which was carried out by unsustainable oversubscription which
eventually resulted in unusable service for a number of years. Having seen
some of the rates that HE has been selling for I can’t help but wonder if
they made the same mistake ...
>
> Here is an example of what’s going on again atm.
> HOST: prolocation01.ring.nlnog.ne Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst
StDev
> 1.|-- 2a00:d00:ff:136::253 0.0% 11 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4
0.0
> 2.|-- 2a00:d00:1:12::1 0.0% 10 0.7 0.8 0.7 1.1
0.1
> 3.|-- hurricane-electric.nikhef 0.0% 10 0.7 3.1 0.7 8.3
2.9
> 4.|-- 100ge9-1.core1.lon2.he.ne 0.0% 10 9.8 12.6 8.0 19.2
4.1
> 5.|-- 100ge1-1.core1.nyc4.he.ne 10.0% 10 74.7 74.6 73.7 80.8
2.3
> 6.|-- 10ge10-3.core1.lax1.he.ne 30.0% 10 133.4 138.0 133.4 145.1
4.8
> 7.|-- 10ge1-3.core1.lax2.he.net 20.0% 10 135.7 139.1 133.4 145.1
4.5
> 8.|-- 2001:504:13::3b 40.0% 10 143.2 143.1 142.1 144.4
0.8
> 9.|-- 2402:7800:100:1::55 50.0% 10 144.4 144.1 143.8 144.4
0.2
> 10.|-- 2402:7800:0:1::f6 60.0% 10 298.7 298.4 298.2 298.7
0.2
> 11.|-- ge-0-1-4.cor02.syd03.nsw. 10.0% 10 299.3 298.9 298.3 299.5
0.5
> 12.|-- 2402:7800:0:2::18a 20.0% 10 299.7 299.4 298.9 300.1
0.4
> 13.|-- 2001:dcd:12::10 30.0% 10 299.8 299.5 298.8 300.0
0.5
>
> Is anybody else observing this as well?
>
> Cheers,
> Wolfgang
More information about the NANOG
mailing list