Fwd: Hurricane Electric packet loss

Shawn L shawnl at up.net
Tue Jul 22 18:37:13 UTC 2014


On our HE uplink, I'm seeing no packet loss until your hop #9
at that point I see alot


HOST: ********                  Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev
  1.|-- *******        0.0%    10    0.2   0.2   0.2   0.3   0.0
  2.|-- *******                0.0%    10    0.3   0.3   0.3   0.3   0.0
  3.|-- *******          0.0%    10    4.4   4.5   4.3   4.6   0.0
  4.|-- gigabitethernet3-5.core1.  0.0%    10   15.6  15.1  14.1  17.2   1.0
  5.|-- 10ge5-7.core1.mci3.he.net  0.0%    10   26.2  26.7  26.2  30.1   1.0
  6.|-- 10ge5-1.core1.den1.he.net  0.0%    10   39.7  39.7  39.5  40.2   0.0
  7.|-- 10ge14-5.core1.lax2.he.ne  0.0%    10   66.8  65.9  63.5  68.4   1.6
  8.|-- 2001:504:13::3b            0.0%    10   73.0  73.0  72.8  73.1   0.0
  9.|-- 2402:7800:100:1::55       80.0%    10   71.8  71.8  71.8  71.9   0.0
 10.|-- ten-0-5-0-0.cor01.syd04.n  0.0%    10  228.0 228.1 227.9 228.3   0.0
 11.|-- ge-0-1-4.cor02.syd03.nsw.  0.0%    10  228.4 228.4 228.3 228.6   0.0
 12.|-- 2402:7800:0:2::18a        10.0%    10  228.2 228.1 228.0 228.3   0.0
 13.|-- 2001:dcd:12::10           10.0%    10  229.2 229.3 229.2 229.5   0.0



On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Wolfgang Nagele (AusRegistry)
<wolfgang.nagele at ausregistry.com.au> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We’ve been customers of Hurricane Electric for a number of years now and
always been happy with their service.
>
> In recent months packet loss on some of their major routes has become a
very common (every few days) occurrence. Without knowledge of their network
I am unsure what’s the cause of it but we’ve seen it on the Tokyo - US
routes as well as the London - US routes. It reminds me of the Cogent
expansion which was carried out by unsustainable oversubscription which
eventually resulted in unusable service for a number of years. Having seen
some of the rates that HE has been selling for I can’t help but wonder if
they made the same mistake ...
>
> Here is an example of what’s going on again atm.
> HOST: prolocation01.ring.nlnog.ne Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst
StDev
>   1.|-- 2a00:d00:ff:136::253       0.0%    11    0.3   0.3   0.3   0.4
0.0
>   2.|-- 2a00:d00:1:12::1           0.0%    10    0.7   0.8   0.7   1.1
0.1
>   3.|-- hurricane-electric.nikhef  0.0%    10    0.7   3.1   0.7   8.3
2.9
>   4.|-- 100ge9-1.core1.lon2.he.ne  0.0%    10    9.8  12.6   8.0  19.2
4.1
>   5.|-- 100ge1-1.core1.nyc4.he.ne 10.0%    10   74.7  74.6  73.7  80.8
2.3
>   6.|-- 10ge10-3.core1.lax1.he.ne 30.0%    10  133.4 138.0 133.4 145.1
4.8
>   7.|-- 10ge1-3.core1.lax2.he.net 20.0%    10  135.7 139.1 133.4 145.1
4.5
>   8.|-- 2001:504:13::3b           40.0%    10  143.2 143.1 142.1 144.4
0.8
>   9.|-- 2402:7800:100:1::55       50.0%    10  144.4 144.1 143.8 144.4
0.2
>  10.|-- 2402:7800:0:1::f6         60.0%    10  298.7 298.4 298.2 298.7
0.2
>  11.|-- ge-0-1-4.cor02.syd03.nsw. 10.0%    10  299.3 298.9 298.3 299.5
0.5
>  12.|-- 2402:7800:0:2::18a        20.0%    10  299.7 299.4 298.9 300.1
0.4
>  13.|-- 2001:dcd:12::10           30.0%    10  299.8 299.5 298.8 300.0
0.5
>
> Is anybody else observing this as well?
>
> Cheers,
> Wolfgang



More information about the NANOG mailing list