Verizon Public Policy on Netflix

Scott Helms khelms at zcorum.com
Tue Jul 22 14:19:05 UTC 2014


Isn't it interesting how that coincides with pay per bit (for the most
part) pricing.


Scott Helms
Vice President of Technology
ZCorum
(678) 507-5000
--------------------------------
http://twitter.com/kscotthelms
--------------------------------


On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Ca By <cb.list6 at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Jul 22, 2014 7:04 AM, "Jared Mauch" <jared at puck.nether.net> wrote:
> >
> > Verizon wireless has other transits apart from 701.
> >
>
> That's interesting that they have a different capacity management strategy
> for the competitive wireless market than they have for their captive
> landline customers.
>
> Seems market forces are making wireless a functional network without the
> peering brinksmanship while market failings are allowing landline to take
> advantage of a captive install base
>
> > Sent via telepathy
> >
> > > On Jul 22, 2014, at 9:01 AM, Ca By <cb.list6 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Question: does verizon wireless have a different capacity / peering
> > > practice from verizon broadband ? Or do verizon wireless customers
>  also
> > > suffer the same performance issue?
>


More information about the NANOG mailing list