Hurricane Electric packet loss
Nicolas Chabbey
nchabbey at n3network.ch
Tue Jul 22 12:23:01 UTC 2014
Forget about it. The delay are correct, my mistake. I should look more
carefully.
I also been a regular customer of HE, and always been satisfied with
their service, especially regarding the IPv6 transit.
On 07/22/2014 02:13 PM, Nicolas Chabbey wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Did you notice the average RTT delay from the 5th hop and beyond? I'm
> not sure if you can trust the values according to the high packet
> loss, but it may indicate an additional problem (or MAY confirm your
> assumption about congestion).
>
> On 07/22/2014 11:48 AM, Wolfgang Nagele (AusRegistry) wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We’ve been customers of Hurricane Electric for a number of years now
>> and always been happy with their service.
>>
>> In recent months packet loss on some of their major routes has become
>> a very common (every few days) occurrence. Without knowledge of their
>> network I am unsure what’s the cause of it but we’ve seen it on the
>> Tokyo - US routes as well as the London - US routes. It reminds me of
>> the Cogent expansion which was carried out by unsustainable
>> oversubscription which eventually resulted in unusable service for a
>> number of years. Having seen some of the rates that HE has been
>> selling for I can’t help but wonder if they made the same mistake ...
>>
>> Here is an example of what’s going on again atm.
>> HOST: prolocation01.ring.nlnog.ne Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst
>> StDev
>> 1.|-- 2a00:d00:ff:136::253 0.0% 11 0.3 0.3 0.3
>> 0.4 0.0
>> 2.|-- 2a00:d00:1:12::1 0.0% 10 0.7 0.8 0.7
>> 1.1 0.1
>> 3.|-- hurricane-electric.nikhef 0.0% 10 0.7 3.1 0.7
>> 8.3 2.9
>> 4.|-- 100ge9-1.core1.lon2.he.ne 0.0% 10 9.8 12.6 8.0
>> 19.2 4.1
>> 5.|-- 100ge1-1.core1.nyc4.he.ne 10.0% 10 74.7 74.6 73.7
>> 80.8 2.3
>> 6.|-- 10ge10-3.core1.lax1.he.ne 30.0% 10 133.4 138.0 133.4
>> 145.1 4.8
>> 7.|-- 10ge1-3.core1.lax2.he.net 20.0% 10 135.7 139.1 133.4
>> 145.1 4.5
>> 8.|-- 2001:504:13::3b 40.0% 10 143.2 143.1 142.1
>> 144.4 0.8
>> 9.|-- 2402:7800:100:1::55 50.0% 10 144.4 144.1 143.8
>> 144.4 0.2
>> 10.|-- 2402:7800:0:1::f6 60.0% 10 298.7 298.4 298.2
>> 298.7 0.2
>> 11.|-- ge-0-1-4.cor02.syd03.nsw. 10.0% 10 299.3 298.9 298.3
>> 299.5 0.5
>> 12.|-- 2402:7800:0:2::18a 20.0% 10 299.7 299.4 298.9
>> 300.1 0.4
>> 13.|-- 2001:dcd:12::10 30.0% 10 299.8 299.5 298.8
>> 300.0 0.5
>>
>> Is anybody else observing this as well?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Wolfgang
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list