Best practice for BGP session/ full routes for customer
mark.tinka at seacom.mu
Tue Jul 8 20:58:32 UTC 2014
On Monday, July 07, 2014 08:46:05 PM Jason Lixfeld wrote:
> 1. You already know that multihop is very ugly. If it's
> for a one-off, it's probably fine. But building a
> product around multi-hop wouldn't be my first choice.
We prefer Layer 2 bundling technologies like 802.1AX, POS
bundles or ML-PPP.
However, some customers just can't support this, but have
multiple links to us and need load sharing. In this case,
eBGP Mulit-Hop is a reasonable use-case.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
More information about the NANOG