Cheap LSN/CGN/NAT444 Solution
owen at delong.com
Tue Jul 1 00:27:45 UTC 2014
With enough horsepower, iptables+Linux is adequate for this, depending on your
I would want to put as little money as possible behind CGN in favor of moving as
much as possible towards IPv6 instead.
On Jun 29, 2014, at 22:59 , Skeeve Stevens <skeeve+nanog at eintellegonetworks.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I am sure this is something that a reasonable number of people would have
> done on this list.
> I am after a LSN/CGN/NAT444 solution to put about 1000 Residential profile
> NBN speeds (fastest 100/40) services behind.
> I am looking at a Cisco ASR1001/2, pfSense and am willing to consider other
> options, including open source.... Obviously the cheaper the better.
> This solution is for v4 only, and needs to consider the profile of the
> typical residential users. Any pitfalls would be helpful to know - as in
> what will and and more importantly wont work - or any work-arounds which
> may work.
> This solution is not designed to be long lasting (maybe 6-9 months)... it
> is to get the solution going for up to 1000 users, and once it reaches that
> point then funds will be freed up to roll out a more robust, carrier-grade
> and long term solution (which will include v6). So no criticism on not
> doing v6 straight up please.
> Happy for feedback off-list of any solutions that people have found work
> Note, I am in Australia so any vendors which aren't easily accessible down
> here, won't be useful.
> *Skeeve Stevens - *eintellego Networks Pty Ltd
> skeeve at eintellegonetworks.com ; www.eintellegonetworks.com
> Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve
> facebook.com/eintellegonetworks ; <http://twitter.com/networkceoau>
> experts360: https://expert360.com/profile/d54a9
> twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com
> The Experts Who The Experts Call
> Juniper - Cisco - Cloud - Consulting - IPv4 Brokering
More information about the NANOG