[VoiceOps] Phone Numbers with Calling Restrictions

Jay Ashworth jra at baylink.com
Thu Jan 23 00:31:15 UTC 2014

Sorry. VO correctly doesn't set reply-to, and my MUA, Zimbra, doesn't do reply-to lisr.

I typed it by hand, and put in the wrong list name.
- jra

Adam Rothschild <asr at latency.net> wrote:
>How is this considered even remotely relevant to the NANOG list?
>VoiceOps, I can sort of see...
>On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Jay Ashworth <jra at baylink.com> wrote:
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Tim Donahue" <tim.donahue at gmail.com>
>>> We ported this to an underlying carrier (the guilty party shall
>>> nameless), and according to their engineers they have no option to
>>> disable the SSC.
>>> I actually have no idea if the call I am making is blocked at the
>>> switch for my POTS test line, the LD carrier, or inbound to our ULC
>(or any
>>> other part of the path it might have crossed). This information was
>>> provided to me in the response from our ULC, but it would be
>interesting to
>>> know for future reference where these blocks happen.
>> Waitaminnit.
>> The calls are being blocked... well, they'd have to be being blocked
>> *before they get to your gaining carrier, I guess, right?
>> That nearly *requires* the code to be in the LERG, so the originating
>> can execute it.  We have some people here who know the LERG back and
>> Paul? Anyone else?  You ever heard of this?
>> Can you originate a call to that number from a different carrier via
>> PRI, and see which ISDN error you get back?  Or have someone else
>> it that way?
>> ISDN errors tend to have a bit more data in them.
>> I'd do it, but I don't have any PRIs laying around anymore.
>> Cheers,
>> -- jra
>> --
>> Jay R. Ashworth                  Baylink                      
>jra at baylink.com
>> Designer                     The Things I Think                      
>RFC 2100
>> Ashworth & Associates       http://www.bcp38.info          2000 Land
>Rover DII
>> St Petersburg FL USA      BCP38: Ask For It By Name!           +1 727
>647 1274

Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

More information about the NANOG mailing list