Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency

Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu
Sun Jan 19 20:51:40 UTC 2014

On Sun, 19 Jan 2014 08:58:12 +0100, sthaug at nethelp.no said:

> Some of the other claims (e.g. more secure because IPsec is always
> available) are simply wrong - there is plenty of IPv6 equipment that
> doesn't offer IPsec.

Given the incredible market penetration of IPsec on the v4 side of
the fence, I guess we've found the true reason people aren't moving
to IPv6.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 848 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20140119/1962e2c4/attachment.sig>

More information about the NANOG mailing list