Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency

John van Oppen jvanoppen at spectrumnet.us
Sun Jan 19 09:10:02 UTC 2014

We ended up with 6PE to make the v6 support on our cisco based network behave the same way as v4, IE use TE tunnels, etc.    Given the v4 MPLS this was the only real way to make it the same.

-----Original Message-----
From: joel jaeggli [mailto:joelja at bogus.com] 
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2014 10:56 AM
To: John van Oppen; 'mark.tinka at seacom.mu'; nanog at nanog.org
Subject: Re: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency

On 1/18/14, 10:30 AM, John van Oppen wrote:
> This is exactly what pushed us into 6PE...   it was the only way to make performance similar to v4 from a routing standpoint.

This statement is a bit facile... What platform are you referring to?

> John @ AS11404

More information about the NANOG mailing list