best practice for advertising peering fabric routes
Christopher Morrow
morrowc.lists at gmail.com
Wed Jan 15 18:22:20 UTC 2014
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Niels Bakker <niels=nanog at bakker.net> wrote:
> * nanog at shankland.org (Jim Shankland) [Wed 15 Jan 2014, 18:04 CET]:
>
>> So ... RFC1918 addresses for the IXP fabric, then?
>>
>> (Half kidding, but still ....)
>
>
> They need to be globally unique.
do they? :)
also... there is/was an exchange in south america (columbia maybe?
it's been a while since I saw this in configs) that used
192.168.0.0/16 space for their exchange.
More information about the NANOG
mailing list