EIGRP support !Cisco

Nick Hilliard nick at foobar.org
Wed Jan 8 18:03:41 UTC 2014

On 08/01/2014 17:52, Nick Olsen wrote:
> Completely agree. But this is needed to integrate into an existing network.
> OSPF would've been my first choice.

you'll need to pay cisco tax then.  Cisco opened up most of eigrp to the
ietf as an informational rfc, but didn't release anything related to eigrp
stub areas.  This means that the ietf release is not that useful if a
vendor wanted feature parity with cisco's implementation.  So far I'm not
aware of any vendors who have implemented it.  Maybe some will do so in future.


More information about the NANOG mailing list