question about AS relationship

Mark Tinka mark.tinka at seacom.mu
Fri Feb 21 01:42:43 UTC 2014


On Thursday, February 20, 2014 08:09:35 PM Christopher 
Morrow wrote:
 
> so, yes. pleass tell your upstream your customers so
> proper filtering can be automated and implemented.
> 
> don't turn up bgp customers without filtering, that kills
> kittens.

For all the leaking I've seen in the last four weeks 
(including a well-known operator that was involved in the 
Youtube/Pakistan saga + other well-known global operators 
that could be classified as "a reasonably large tier"), 
we're still a long way away ensuring all customer prefixes 
are filtered correctly at the inter-domain peering edge. A 
loooooooong way away...

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20140221/ccc7734d/attachment.bin>


More information about the NANOG mailing list