LarrySheldon at cox.net
Wed Feb 19 03:10:59 UTC 2014
On 2/18/2014 8:42 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> They are smart and dkim sign their messages; even though it's invalid I
>> believe that's why it has such a low bayes score.
> lots of the spam getting through has no dkim
>> It's getting marked as ham and not spam. Are you positive your
>> definitions are still updating?
> sa-update has run. and it runs cleanly
From a posting on NANAE:
> On 2/18/2014 6:09 PM, Larry Sheldon wrote:
>> Received: from [220.127.116.11] (helo=drone166.ral.icpbounce.com)
> Larry, icpbounce.com is IContact aka Vocus. I don't know whether the
> managers of Vocus are as whitehat as those of IContact were before the
> buyout, but Andrew Barrett was still in charge of abuse/deliverability
> when I last checked and he *does* respond quickly and effectively to
> spam complaints. Try sending this to abuse at icontact.com.
Requiescas in pace o email Two identifying characteristics
of System Administrators:
Ex turpi causa non oritur actio Infallibility, and the ability to
learn from their mistakes.
(Adapted from Stephen Pinker)
More information about the NANOG