Re: "Everyone should be deploying BCP 38! Wait, they are …."
LarrySheldon at cox.net
Tue Feb 18 19:11:03 UTC 2014
On 2/18/2014 11:20 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> Here's a piece which uses the MIT ANA data to assert that the job is
> mostly done already.
> Unless I'm very much mistaken, it appears that a large percentage of
> the failed BCP 38 spoofing tests listed in that data are actually due
> to customer side NAT routers dropping packets...
> which is of course egress filtering rather than ingress filtering,
> and thus doesn't actually apply to our questions.
> Am I interpreting that correctly?
The date seems a little past "buy by" in light of the very recent
observations and comments here.
Requiescas in pace o email Two identifying characteristics
of System Administrators:
Ex turpi causa non oritur actio Infallibility, and the ability to
learn from their mistakes.
(Adapted from Stephen Pinker)
More information about the NANOG