carrier comparison
Sam Moats
sam at circlenet.us
Thu Feb 6 21:30:39 UTC 2014
+1 Same feeling here.
Sam Moats
On 2014-02-06 16:22, Matthew Crocker wrote:
> IMHO Cogent bandwidth is fine so long as it isn’t your only
> bandwidth. Good, Cheap, Fast, Pick any two.
>
>
> --
> Matthew S. Crocker
> President
> Crocker Communications, Inc.
> PO BOX 710
> Greenfield, MA 01302-0710
>
> E: matthew at crocker.com
> P: (413) 746-2760
> F: (413) 746-3704
> W: http://www.crocker.com
>
>
>
> On Feb 6, 2014, at 10:17 AM, Adam Greene <maillist at webjogger.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> We're a small ISP / datacenter with a Time Warner fiber-based DIA
>> contract
>> that is coming up for renewal.
>>
>>
>>
>> We're getting much better pricing offers from Cogent, and are
>> finding out
>> what Level 3 can do for us as well. Both providers will use Time
>> Warner
>> fiber for last mile.
>>
>>
>>
>> My questions are:
>>
>> - Will we be sacrificing quality if we spring for Cogent?
>> (yesterday's Cogent/Verizon thread provided some cold chills for my
>> spine)
>>
>> - Is there a risk with contracting a carrier that utilizes
>> another
>> carrier (such as Time Warner) for the last mile? (i.e. if there is a
>> downtime situation, are we going to be caught in a web of confusion
>> and
>> finger-pointing that delays problem resolution)?
>>
>> - How are peoples' experiences with L3 vs TWC?
>>
>>
>>
>> Although I assume everyone on the list would be interested in what
>> others
>> have to say about these questions, out of respect for the carriers
>> in
>> question, I encourage you to email frank opinions off list.
>>
>>
>>
>> Or if there are third party tools or resources you know that I could
>> consult
>> to deduce the answers to these questions myself, they are most
>> welcome.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Adam
>>
>>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list