ARIN's RPKI Relying agreement
wesley.george at twcable.com
Thu Dec 4 20:10:10 UTC 2014
On 12/4/14, 2:19 PM, "Sandra Murphy" <sandy at tislabs.com> wrote:
>Which begs the question for me -- ARIN already operates services that
>operators rely upon. Why are they different? Does ARIN run no risk of
>litigation due to some perceived involvement of those services in
>someone's operational outage?
WG] I'm hard-pressed to come up with a case where packets stop flowing or
flow to the wrong party because whois is down. *Maybe* you can make that
case for reverse DNS since lots of anti-spam/anti-spoof relies on
forward/reverse DNS agreement, but that doesn't affect routing. RPKI ups
the ante considerably. I believe ARIN when they say that the liability
risks are higher for this.
Anything below this line has been added by my company’s mail server, I
have no control over it.
This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.
More information about the NANOG