ARIN's RPKI Relying agreement
wesley.george at twcable.com
Thu Dec 4 20:06:02 UTC 2014
On 12/4/14, 2:34 PM, "Andrew Gallo" <akg1330 at gmail.com> wrote:
>Am I correct in thinking that the SIDR work going on in the IETF takes the
>registries out of the real-time processing of route
WG] no, but they're at least discussing ways of making the dependencies
less fragile and more scalable (e.g. Eliminating rsync).
>Is RPKI a stop-gap while we wait for full path validation? Should we be
>focusing our energies in that area?
WG] Path Validation is a completely separate pig, one which may require
significantly more thrust to achieve escape velocity when compared with
Origin Validation. Origin Validation isn't a stop gap, as much as it is an
incremental step that Path Validation builds on to provide more additional
protection that Origin Validation alone cannot provide. They're intended
to coexist, not replace.
Anything below this line has been added by my company’s mail server, I
have no control over it.
This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.
More information about the NANOG