ARIN's RPKI Relying agreement

Thu Dec 4 19:19:01 UTC 2014

On Dec 4, 2014, at 12:39 PM, John Curran <jcurran at arin.net> wrote:

> On Dec 4, 2014, at 11:35 AM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
> 

> Note that the claims that could ensue from an operator failing to follow best practices
> and then third-parties suffering an major operational outage is likely to be large

>   
> Undertaking that risk to the other services that everyone else presently rely upon 
> (Whois, reverse DNS) is not reasonable 

Which begs the question for me -- ARIN already operates services that operators rely upon.  Why are they different?  Does ARIN run no risk of litigation due to some perceived involvement of those services in someone's operational outage?

Has there been litigation against ARIN tied to, for example, reverse DNS?  Or the IRR?

--Sandy

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20141204/31a0dcfd/attachment.sig>