Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions
Owen DeLong
owen at delong.com
Mon Dec 1 19:41:27 UTC 2014
> On Nov 10, 2014, at 6:36 PM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> because a /23 of ipv6 is very large.... :)
That’s a good reason not to use a /23, but not a good reason not to use IPv6.
>
> also, it's hard to use ipv6 when your last miile provider doesn't offer it...
>
> #fios
>
No it’s not… #tunnelbroker
Owen
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Bill Woodcock <woody at pch.net> wrote:
>> Why use IPv4 for OOB? Seems a little late in the day for that.
>>
>>
>> -Bill
>>
>>
>>> On Nov 10, 2014, at 15:02, "Christopher Morrow" <morrowc.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Paul S. <contact at winterei.se> wrote:
>>>> I'd be doubtful if anyone will feel like offering a /23 with OOB as
>>>> justification these days, sadly.
>>>
>>> why thought? Justification is really about having a use for the ips,
>>> right? and if you have 500 servers/network-devices ... then you have
>>> justification for a /23 ... it seems to me.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Good luck nonetheless.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On 11/10/2014 午後 11:00, Ruairi Carroll wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hey,
>>>>>
>>>>> VPN setup is not really a viable option (for us) in this scenario.
>>>>> Honestly, I'd prefer to just call it done already and have a VPN but due
>>>>> to
>>>>> certain restraints, we have to go down this route.
>>>>>
>>>>> /Ruairi
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10 November 2014 14:38, Alistair Mackenzie <magicsata at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Couldn't you put a router or VPN system on the single IP they are giving
>>>>>> you and use RFC1918 addressing space?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> OOB doesn't normally justify a /24 let alone a /23.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10 November 2014 13:18, Ruairi Carroll <ruairi.carroll at gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dear List,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've got an upcoming deployment in Equinix (DC10) and I'm struggling to
>>>>>>> find a provider who can give me a 100Mbit port (With a commit of about
>>>>>>> 5-10Mbit) with a /23 or /24 of public space , for OOB purposes. We had
>>>>>>> hoped to use Equinixs services, however they're limiting us to a single
>>>>>>> public IP.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm also open to other solutions - xDSL or similar, but emphasis is on
>>>>>>> cheap and on-net.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>> /Ruairi
>>>>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list