Hugo Slabbert hugo at slabnet.com
Mon Aug 18 18:35:21 UTC 2014

> Per Michael Valentine Smith should work.

This also has the benefit of working over IPv6 (::1) without violating  
the ineffibility Karl referred to.

Although, technically, since many gods are omnipresent, shouldn't you  
just be able to send the packet to any address and it will be  
received?  I'm not clear on the implementation details as I would  
assume the gods would need to be in promiscuous mode for that to work  
and I'm pretty sure that would pose a problem for some gods that are  
said to be omnipresent...

----- Message from Joe Hamelin <joe at nethead.com> ---------
    Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 11:15:39 -0700
    From: Joe Hamelin <joe at nethead.com>
Subject: Re: Urgent
      To: Randy Bush <randy at psg.com>
      Cc: NANOG list <nanog at nanog.org>

> On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 10:00 AM, <randy at psg.com> wrote:
>> Contact for God, please reach out to me offlist.
> Per Michael Valentine Smith should work.
> --
> Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip, WA, 360-474-7474

----- End message from Joe Hamelin <joe at nethead.com> -----


More information about the NANOG mailing list