So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today

Owen DeLong owen at delong.com
Thu Aug 14 11:52:13 UTC 2014


I believe at one point, SPRINT had in the RADB (and actively advertised) 0.0.0.0/2, 64.0.0.0/2, 128.0.0.0/2, and 192.0.0.0/2 under something called  “Quarter Default Route, see Rational Default Project” or words to that effect.

I could be wrong. It was a long time ago and I barely remember SPRINT any more.

Owen

On Aug 13, 2014, at 9:47 PM, Steve Noble <snoble at sonn.com> wrote:

> Sprint also had 192/2 in the RADB :)
> 
> manning bill wrote:
>> 
>> Sprint used to proxy aggregate… I remember 128.0.0.0/3
>> 
>> the real question, imho, is if folks are going to look into their crystal balls and roadmap where the default offered is a /32 (either v4 or v6)
>> and plan accordingly, or just slap another bandaid on the oozing wound...
>> 
>> /bill
>> PO Box 12317
>> Marina del Rey, CA 90295
>> 310.322.8102
>> 



More information about the NANOG mailing list