[j-nsp] Viability of EX4300 in a primarily l3 environment?

Paul S. contact at winterei.se
Wed Aug 6 12:15:01 UTC 2014


On 8/6/2014 午後 09:13, Vincent Bernat wrote:
>   ❦  6 août 2014 20:54 +0900, "Paul S." <contact at winterei.se> :
>
>> Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't OSPF require the AFL license
>> anyway to be 'legitly' ran?
> OSPF does not need a feature license on those models (it is needed on
> EX2200). AFL is needed for BGP, IS-IS and MPLS.

3300 too, apparently -- thanks for the correction.


More information about the NANOG mailing list