We hit half-million: The Cidr Report

Charles Gucker cgucker at onesc.net
Tue Apr 29 04:45:41 UTC 2014


On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:39 PM, <Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu> wrote:

> On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 21:59:43 -0400, "Patrick W. Gilmore" said:
> > > On Apr 28, 2014, at 19:41, Chris Boyd <cboyd at gizmopartners.com> wrote:
> > > I'm in the middle of a physical move.  I promise I'll take the 3
> deagg'd
> > > /24s out as soon as I can.
> > Do not laugh. If everyone who had 3 de-agg'ed prefixes fixed it, the
> table
> > would drop precipitously. We all have to do our part.
>
> Do we have a handle on what percent of the de-aggrs are legitimate attempts
> at TE, and what percent are just whoopsies that should be re-aggregated?
>

And of those TE routes, how many can be suppressed by way of BGP
Communities with their respective upstream providers ...

charles



More information about the NANOG mailing list