Pluggable Coherent DWDM 10Gig

Tim Durack tdurack at gmail.com
Sat Apr 26 11:17:15 UTC 2014


Will need amplification anyway for almost any realistic topology.

For those who don't understand what or why, please read the Terastream PDF
and watch the video several times, then tell me it's not a great idea :-)

On Saturday, April 26, 2014, Julien Goodwin <nanog at studio442.com.au> wrote:

> On 26/04/14 16:02, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> > On Sat, 26 Apr 2014, Julien Goodwin wrote:
> >
> >> But you'd never send it all the waves anyway, that's far too much loss
> >> across the band.
> >
> > Please elaborate.
>
> At 3dB loss per split you'd very quickly need additional amplification,
> at which point the ROADM is cheaper. A static split can do the 80 waves
> in much less than the ~20dB a power split would need, and
>
> >
> >> ROADMs already solve this problem, and are available at the module level
> >> (how practically available and usable I've no idea, never needed to
> try).
> >
> > Compare the price of a ROADM and a 50%/50% light splitter. Which one do
> > you think is the cheapest and also operationally most reliable?
>
> Not disagreeing, I'd go with dumb static optics, nearly all the
> "reconfigurable" optic selling points don't seem to translate into
> actual operational benefits.
>
>

-- 
Tim:>



More information about the NANOG mailing list