Requirements for IPv6 Firewalls

Florian Weimer fw at
Sat Apr 19 10:23:37 UTC 2014

* Simon Perreault:

> Le 2014-04-18 13:25, Mike Hale a écrit :
>> I agree with Bill.  You can poopoo NAT all you want, but it's a fact
>> of most networks and will continue to remain so until you can make a
>> compelling case to move away from it.
> Does that mean all IPv6 firewalls should support NAT?

In the sense that they "MUST be able to provide email filtering
features": yes.

> Remember, we're aiming for a base set of requirements applying to
> all IPv6 firewalls.

The document has more than just base requirements.

More information about the NANOG mailing list