DMARC -> CERT?

Thu Apr 17 15:34:35 UTC 2014

On Wed, 16 Apr 2014 21:19:18 -0700, Private Sender said:

> I'm sorry but is there a fundamental misunderstanding of dmarc going on
> in this thread?

Yes, apparently mostly on the part of Yahoo apologists...

> There is no need to flame a company because they implemented a policy to
> ensure QoS to their customers. Either push your mail through their
> servers, or Just find somewhere else you can push your mailing lists
> through.

Is it me, or has every single Yahoo apologist in this thread insisted
on this same misrepresentation of the situation?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 848 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20140417/ddc5057e/attachment.sig>