responding to DMARC breakage

Valdis.Kletnieks at Valdis.Kletnieks at
Sat Apr 12 16:49:04 UTC 2014

On Sat, 12 Apr 2014 10:12:09 -0400, Miles Fidelman said:

> It occurs to me that Yahoo's deployment of DMARC p=reject, and the
> choice of several big mail operators to honor that, has created a
> situation not unlike a really routing table or nameserver, snafu ---

It's more like a peering war.  Time for somebody to either bake a cake,
or find alternate transit providers.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 848 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <>

More information about the NANOG mailing list