DNSSEC?
Bill Woodcock
woody at pch.net
Fri Apr 11 18:50:28 UTC 2014
On Apr 11, 2014, at 11:35 AM, Barry Shein <bzs at world.std.com> wrote:
>
> So, DNSSEC is also compromised by this heartbleed bug, right?
Nope, apples and oranges.
http://www.afilias.info/webfm_send/32
The only point of intersection I can think of is an indirect one, and unfortunately not much used yet: DANE certificates for TLS/SSL connections.
-Bill
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20140411/046cdea5/attachment.sig>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list