BGPMON Alert Questions

Tue Apr 8 10:49:10 UTC 2014

On Tuesday, April 08, 2014 11:24:07 AM Jac Kloots wrote:

> We (SURFnet, AS1103) are in the same position and I wrote
> an article about the evaluation we did before deciding
> on dropping invalids (https://blog.surfnet.nl/?p=3159)

Sounds great, Jac!

In your report, you mention that you're not validating 
customer prefixes. Is this still the case?

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20140408/540a49b9/attachment.sig>