BGPMON Alert Questions
Jac.Kloots at surfnet.nl
Tue Apr 8 09:24:07 UTC 2014
On Thu, 3 Apr 2014, Mark Tinka wrote:
> On Thursday, April 03, 2014 02:22:44 AM Randy Bush wrote:
>> and, btw, how many of those whose prefixes were
>> mis-originated had registered those prefixes in the
> It is probably a bit of a hammer at this stage, but we are
> in limited deployment of dropping all Invalids using RPKI.
> We shall be rolling out, network-wide, in 2014, where all
> Invalids are dropped. At this stage, short of a mis-
> origination, it's mostly longer prefixes of an aggregate
> that are not ROA'd.
Great to hear more people are planning on dropping all Invalids.
We (SURFnet, AS1103) are in the same position and I wrote an article about
the evaluation we did before deciding on dropping invalids
I would encourage more people to do a similar analysis and start using a
RPKI routing policy and start dropping invalids.
Only when people start using RPKI the way it is proposted to
(http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7115) we _all_ can benefit from this.
More information about the NANOG