BGPMON Alert Questions

Thu Apr 3 12:31:51 UTC 2014

On Thursday, April 03, 2014 02:22:44 AM Randy Bush wrote:

> and, btw, how many of those whose prefixes were
> mis-originated had registered those prefixes in the
> rpki?

It is probably a bit of a hammer at this stage, but we are 
in limited deployment of dropping all Invalids using RPKI.

We shall be rolling out, network-wide, in 2014, where all 
Invalids are dropped. At this stage, short of a mis-
origination, it's mostly longer prefixes of an aggregate 
that are not ROA'd.

I was asleep when Indosat was mis-originating, but it'd have 
been nice to see what our test-bed was doing to any Indosat-
injected prefixes that have ROA's.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20140403/ddc939f8/attachment.sig>