BGPMON Alert Questions
mark.tinka at seacom.mu
Thu Apr 3 12:04:44 UTC 2014
On Wednesday, April 02, 2014 08:59:58 PM Justin M. Streiner
> It's pretty clear that both parties have dropped the ball
> in a big way, in terms of sane BGP filtering practices.
It's amazing, isn't it?
I have a customer of one my upstreams (Upstream A), at the
moment, who are leaking my routes to another one of their
upstreams (Upstream B). The problem is that Upstream B is
re-announcing my leaked routes from their customer to the
rest of the Internet.
So both Upstream B's customer as well as Upstream B are at
fault. That Upstream B is simply "accepting everything"
their customer is sending to them without applying proper
filters, or checking to confirm that what their customer
needs to send them should come from them is absolutely and
A lot of people seem to have forgotten 2008.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
More information about the NANOG