minimum IPv6 announcement size
bross at pobox.com
Fri Sep 27 14:40:15 UTC 2013
On Fri, 27 Sep 2013, Ryan McIntosh wrote:
> It's a waste, even if we're "planning for the future", no one house
> needs a /64 sitting on their lan.. or at least none I can sensibly
> think of o_O.
Okay, I'm just curious, what size do you (and other's of similar opinion)
think the IPv6 space _should_ have been in order to allow us to not have
to jump through conservation hoops ever again? 128 bits isn't enough,
clearly, 256? 1k? 10k?
Brandon Ross Yahoo & AIM: BrandonNRoss
+1-404-635-6667 ICQ: 2269442
Schedule a meeting: https://doodle.com/bross Skype: brandonross
More information about the NANOG