minimum IPv6 announcement size

Måns Nilsson mansaxel at besserwisser.org
Wed Sep 25 05:52:16 UTC 2013


Subject: Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Date: Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 11:10:52AM +0800 Quoting Nathanael C. Cariaga (nccariaga at stluke.com.ph):
> Hi,
> 
> I raised actually this concern during our IP resource application.
> 
> On a personal note, I think /48 IPv6 allocation is more than enough
> for our organization to use for at least the next 5-10 years
> assuming that this can be farmed out to our multiple sites. What
> makes this complicated for us is that we are operating on a multiple
> sites (geographically) with each site is doing multi-homing and
> having a /48 in each site would be very big waste of IP resources.

If you've got island networks w/o links between you SHOULD request a /48 per site. 

-- 
Måns Nilsson     primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina
MN-1334-RIPE                             +46 705 989668
Pardon me, but do you know what it means to be TRULY ONE with your BOOTH!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20130925/819028a4/attachment.sig>


More information about the NANOG mailing list