DNS Reliability

Phil Fagan philfagan at gmail.com
Thu Sep 12 20:25:25 UTC 2013


Its a good point about the anycast; 99.999% should be expected.


On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Beavis <pfunix at gmail.com> wrote:

> I go with 99.999% given that you have a good number of DNS Servers
> (anycasted).
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Phil Fagan <philfagan at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Everything else remaining equal...is there a standard or expectation for
>> DNS reliability?
>>
>> 98%
>> 99%
>> 99.5%
>> 99.9%
>> 99.99%
>> 99.999%
>>
>> Measured in queries completed vs. queries lost.
>>
>> Whats the consensus?
>>
>>
>> --
>> Phil Fagan
>> Denver, CO
>> 970-480-7618
>>
>
>
>
> --
> ()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
> /\  www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments
>
> Disclaimer:
> http://goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/
>



-- 
Phil Fagan
Denver, CO
970-480-7618



More information about the NANOG mailing list