Policy-based routing is evil? Discuss.
Christopher Morrow
morrowc.lists at gmail.com
Fri Oct 11 18:35:21 UTC 2013
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 2:13 PM, William Waites <wwaites at tardis.ed.ac.uk> wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 10:41:46 -0700, joel jaeggli <joelja at bogus.com> said:
> > evil is not a synonym for ugly patch placed over a problem that
> > could be handled better.
>
> Ok, fair enough. My first experience with PBR was as a summer intern in
> the mid-1990s who inherited management of a large ATM network that had
> a big VPN-esque thing built entirely that way and with no
> documentation. It certainly felt evil at the time. ;)
I think really PBR violates this:
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_least_astonishment>
I see ISP folks MOSTLY avoid PBR, because it does weird things that
NOC/ops folks just plain don't expect. I see Enterprise network folks
fall back to PBR often, for reasons that they seem happy with... but
man it makes things confusing :)
-chris
More information about the NANOG
mailing list