Policy-based routing is evil? Discuss.
Jay Ashworth
jra at baylink.com
Fri Oct 11 18:33:14 UTC 2013
----- Original Message -----
> From: "joel jaeggli" <joelja at bogus.com>
> you take all the useful information that an IGP could be (or is)
> providing you, and then you ignore it and do something else.
Well, I tell you what.
My perception of where this was a good idea is the use case a recent
client might have for it:
Two consumer-grade uplinks (FiOS 150 and RR 100, specifically); primary
application is callcenter, VoIP to a service provider Elsewhere.
I would set it up so that all the VoIP and callcenter web traffic went over
FiOS *until it failed*, and everything else went Road Runner *unless it
failed*.
This keeps the general traffic out of the hair of the latency/PPS sensitive
traffic whenever possible.
Is that not policy-based routing?
Why is it bad?
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra at baylink.com
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA #natog +1 727 647 1274
More information about the NANOG
mailing list