Automatic abuse reports

Wed Nov 13 05:22:21 UTC 2013

On Nov 12, 2013, at 9:16 PM, Brandon Galbraith <brandon.galbraith at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:03 PM, William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
>>> Now it would be trivial to setup syslog and sshd to give only the sessions
>>> that complete the handshake, however I'm also not sure how responsive some
>>> of the abuse contacts may be. I'll keep my restrictive network settings for
>>> the time being.
>> 
>> That's the main problem: you can generate the report but if it's about
>> some doofus in Dubai what are the odds of it doing any good?
> 
> And then we're right back to sending the offending packets to a black
> hole. *sigh*
> 

a packet that you can drop quickly is a packet you don’t have to think about.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20131112/0be4e1db/attachment.sig>